Talk:What Tambourine

Retcon What Tambourine's "immortality" (-1)
Let´s do that. There is no reason for him to live forever, and it's Mary Sue. -- Quackerpingu   (talk).   Contributions   A link   17:46, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

For (3)

 * 1) --QuackSign.png Quackerpingu   (talk).   Contributions   A link  QuackSign2.png 17:46, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 18:01, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 3) -- Dave33333   The Epic King   has returned!  19:15, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Against (4)

 * 1)   C  K   Sysop / BOBmaster ? 20:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 2) ulsk avatar.png (T • C • Y) 00:25, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 3) --WP.png  Wikipenguino   (talk  | contribs  | articles ) memes Bananaphone.gif 00:35, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 4) mario rk 04:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments

 * Extremely hypocritical of Chill since he himself proposed cutting penguins' lifespans. -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 18:01, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * This really doesn't need to be a council proposal. There's no reason why you couldn't post a section about this on the page's talk page instead of making an entire council topic about this one article. -- User:EDFan 1234  5  18:44, 26 July 2017 (UTC)


 * It's the council and everybody can make whatever nonsense proposal they please. -- Dave33333   The Epic King   has returned!  19:06, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * And nonsense topics can be removed.   C  K   Sysop / BOBmaster ? 20:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The HP lifespan vote was to stop a mary sue quality among a whole species, but very long lifespans are still a thing on the wiki if done in a creative and thoughtful way. We don't want to limit people's creativity here, and one character living to 5000 isn't the end of the world. Also, have you seen the Hochstadt Gang?   C  K   Sysop / BOBmaster ? 20:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The whole point of the article is to highlight the fact that you can still have some sort of immortality even if High Penguins are retconned, a concept that we were already saying during the entire High Penguin debate, but it looks like you didn't listen, did you?! ulsk avatar.png (T • C • Y) 00:25, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Being immortal in some other way than being from an immortal species IS Mary Sue. --62.65.226.120 10:49, 27 July 2017 (UTC) (QP)
 * How so? Could you explain? --WP.png  Wikipenguino   (talk  | contribs  | articles ) memes Bananaphone.gif 11:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * It is. No explaining is needed. --62.65.226.120 11:35, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * So by your definition, is the entire Hochstadt Gang a group of Mary Sues merely on the grounds that they're immortal? Are all robots Mary Sue since they don't die of age? Also who the heck are you, sign in plox (though my assumption is quacker) ulsk avatar.png (T • C • Y) 13:53, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * At least some of the Hochstadt Gang members are High Penguins, so they weren´t mary sue before the high penguin retcon vote. Still, some page said that they got it as a prize after saving the universe or something like that, so that could be considered canon now. They are still quite Mary Sue, though. Also, robots are not immortal. For example, they can break if they fall in water. --62.65.226.120 17:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC) (QP)
 * I think you're confusing immortality with invulnerability. --WP.png  Wikipenguino   (talk  | contribs  | articles ) memes Bananaphone.gif 17:51, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * No. BTW, robots can also short-circuit, explode, shut down, etc. --62.65.226.120 20:40, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Immortality ≠ Mary Sue. The whole High Penguin immortality retcon doesn't forbid the use of immortality in articles altogether. What matters is using it carefully. --WP.png  Wikipenguino   (<span title="Talk to meh!!!">talk  | <span title="I have  edits!">contribs  | <span title="Houston, we have a problem">articles ) memes Bananaphone.gif 00:41, 27 July 2017 (UTC)