User blog talk:Agent Johnson/Important


 * The entire crux of this piece of crap was the the CPW is superior and more stable than the CPFW. The CPFW is unstable because entitled lowlifes think they have "rights" to do whatever they please. They rip open huge arguments and hide behind their manufactured "rights" that they forced me to sign with a gun to my head. An entitled class of power hungry dictators- just as dictorial and iron-fisted as me -have risen to power and are heck-bent on killing what is left of my legacy and work on this website. I didn't have any rights when I came to the CPW in 2008. I had PRIVELAGES. I worked TOOTH AND NAIL to earn these PRIVELAGES, and I can not take much more of you simultaneously ripping all I have worked for away from me while giving that which I spent my entire adolescent lifespan to earn to some monkey with a keyboard in the name of "equality". There are no "rights" on this site, just privelages. Privelages can be revoked. It is self-entitlement that made this site unstable, not me. A selfish generation of spoiled brats, led by the ghost of AgentGenius, has injected artificial notions of "I deserve this" and "I deserve that" and have pinned ME as evil for opposing their instability. I tried restoring order by deleting the cause of what caused the chaos, and none of you have ever thanked me. I wrote a letter, far longer than this, to Swiss Ninja detailing what this means to me and what it feels like. I'll probably release it, though none of you probably care.
 * Oh, and make sure to twist that knife EXTRA HARD into my back, while you're at it. A coup d'etat has happened every July, so I have plenty of scar tissue for you to make use of. -- † TurtleShroom ™!  Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! †     :)  :)     It's July again, everyone. Get your knives and aim for my back.  You deserve no 'rights'. I worked here for years and never had 'rights'. I had privelages. Privelages that I EARNED through HARD WIKI WORK.  [2 ]

20:49, 18 June 2012 (UTC)  
 * What makes ya think that people are out to destroy you, TS? I mean, even if they don't agree with you morally or politically, I'm pretty sure they're not out to literally get you: they just want to change in an attempt to make things better or worse (because after all, change doesn't go perfectly). Anyone who clearly has anything against you should probably not even participate in this debate, no?
 * Now, excuse me to come down from the cloud I sit at, and pardon to everyone else for having to read this text-blob, but I would like to suggest something to ya, TS. I've known you for years, and I quite understand you detest change and the like as do I. But look around you, TS- a brand new generation has settled on the wiki; and like I, you've found other paths and your interest here isn't as sharp as it once was. Sentimentality is the only link between us and here: we're afraid to let go of everything we've come to be, everything we knew and cherished- but I have come to understand that the generations ahead, although respecting the past, must change eventually ( I'm not saying you have to like their ideals, though). We may not like it, but hey, sometimes life throws things at ya that you don't like, eh? Anyway, if you're as inactive as you say, I think letting go of the reigns might get rid of some of your stresses, too; not to digress too far off-topic, but with your future ahead of you I'm sure you've got other plans. To everyone else out there: I ask that you please not turn this into a TS-bashing "coup d'etat" or whatever you call it, alright?  The hatred isn't appreciated. ^_^ -- Hat Pop   Bunny Ears Rule! 21:31, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree with Hat Pop. I have nothing else to say. There's your response TurtleShroom, but you didn't have to delete a page to get my attention. I can easily look in the Recent Changes. Locked, what Hat Pop has to say is right and no more responses are needed.--John''' (talk 04:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)