Talk:Peach Inc.

Against adoption
Just going to put in my two cents here for now- I don't think an article this old and ingrained into continuity, as well as being a parody of popular company, should be allowed to be adopted. It seems like it'd be fine as a fair game article, and I doubt any disputes would arise as long as someone didn't want to... I don't know, move their headquarters or something silly like that. My stance is about the same for Eureka.

Just because you can't have "complete control" over an article doesn't mean you can't contribute to it.   C  K   Sysop  08:56, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

I thought Ninjinian created the article so doesn't that mean he still has rights...? -- Wikipen guino45  (Talk ) (Contribs ) ( Articles ) 09:57, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

You need to make better excuses if you don’t want me to adopt and improve articles because I’m really tired of you causing trouble with literally every single thing I do, especially preventing me from adopting anything on this wiki. I can’t do anything without you getting on me and claiming I violate some policy or you just don’t like me to do so. No one was going to expand this article anyways and I added a bunch of paragraphs but if you don’t want that than revert my edits already instead of making a stupid excuse about it. Has there ever been a time where I could actually exist without it violating some new policy that you made? --Brant (Talk) (Contributions) 01:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Getting a n g e r y over a legitimate comment on this doesn't exactly help your case, you know. -- User:EDFan 1234  5  01:15, 24 May 2018 (UTC)