User blog:Agent Johnson/Important/Commentary

Put here any suggestions, improvements and criticisms. -- Agent Johnson |  My old signature is too long for a rant. So here's a new one.  01:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * The wiki isn't like what it was with the large community going over controversial arguments. It isn't like what  you and I remember anymore. This doesn't apply to the wiki in its current state. This is a good plan, but it's not really necessary to go through this change, as the policies set right now are just regarded as guidelines. Icmer In Nyc 78% of PC gamers have played Minecraft.  No wonder why our eyesight is so bad. 02:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I'd like to point out: this makes cross wiki editing easier. I'm in full support of this. Happyface414''' (talk 02:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * FYI- Feey was rebanned again due to bad behavior and treason. Ice and I were trying do defeat him to save our wiki. That conflict is long gone...but you wouldnt know cause youre not very active, TS. --Swiss Ninja Signature.png User Talk SN.png 14:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * TS gave his criticism. If he does anything like delete another page or wipe out some text, then I will treat him like a regular user; that means official warnings, blocks etc (the latter will be discussed with the other Admins... a positive of integration TS, since before we had no limits). Also, you have no rights to lock the Wiki without community consent.-- Agent Johnson |  My old signature is too long for a rant. So here's a new one.  15:01, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Consensus is cowardice and the absence of leadership. It means that there isn't someone strong enough to get things done. I've done more for this site than anything you have ever done. I'm not an administrator in name, but that's only because the routine coups d'etat againgst me and the heck-bent obbsession of all of you ungrateful whiners to destroy me at every angle successfully put me back at Promoter. You're not blocking me. If I get blocked, I'll get out of it. You are not my boss, and I will not consent to your strong-armed ruleset. I am working and typing these messages by the ruleset that predated the choas: a time capsule where I was actually treated with some agree of respect and throwing tantrums because you couldn't have your way actually got you a punishment.
 * (-and don't spin this and say I'm having a hypocritical tantrum. I'm defending what is already here and what is right, and I have the full right to stop a secondary Wikia takeover with the sole purpose, as Andrew's gatekeeper statement shows, to kill anything I have left.)
 * You only want change from an oligarchy because I'm in it. This wiki isn't a country. It's a private intitution, and I've said from day one that you don't have any rights except that which are given to you. All of your "I deserve this and I deserve that" crap stems from the ultimate thorn in my side- Agent Genius -and a massive scale of envy that has routinely toppled me from power time after time.
 * It's amazing, actually, that the people who constantly overthrow me never stop and think that I was the one of the biggest players to help build their infrastructure, write continuity, and carry this site on my back. Great men like Kwiksilver and Speeddasher have done inifinite things as well, but so have I, and yet everyone seems to forget all the good I;ve done to push me out of power.
 * (It's why I supported Murbarak in the Arab Spring. He built Egypt's infrastructure, gave them all sorts of Western freedoms, and his only real demand in turn was to be the one in charge and that people wouldn't whine about it.)
 * You will not silence me from this debate by blocking me. Deleting pages and writing filibusters are the only way I can speak, because in consensus, I'm intentionally silenced by uneducated IPs-turned users that line up rank and file to rubberstamp the "reforms" designed to kill me. When every man is equal, I'm nothing because all my loyalists have long died off the wiki or fell from grace. (Others who "support" me just support me as a friend, not a leader, so no problem with them.)
 * The CPFW needs a strong man to simply say what needs to be done, and do it. We don't need to waste editors' time with governing. They need to focus on what needs to be done: EDITING. Leave the governing to the autistic loser that doesn't have any real life to go to. Leave it to me.
 * - † TurtleShroom ™!  Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! †     :)  :)     They're after my money! STOP THEM!   UNDER REPRESENTATION, PRESIDENTE! YOU ARE NOT IN THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF YOUR PEOPLE EVERY WAKING MOMENT!  [2 ]

21:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * And, of course, as I come here for my monthly check, leaving Nationstates, I see...well, this. TS ranting about something perfectly fine. Holding back progress and an attempt to revive. I think I can summarize what everybody wants in a few sentences. Not a filibuster, not a page-long speech with seven paragraphs-just a few sentences. Fairly simple ones.
 * TS, you are not the wiki, and the wiki is not yours. You are not the dictator anymore. The wiki used to be my place. It used to be yours. But...perhaps it's time to let go. It's not really your place anymore. It hasn't been mine for a while. Have you considered that? Just move on and let go. --Austin8310 17:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Austin, I try to let go from this site, but it keeps pulling me back in. It's one of the only things I really feel that I made better and actually got to call the shots on. Everything else online, I'm but another fish in the sea. -but here, oh here, I actually did something and led something. I literally put the CPFW on my resume. I made my mark here. I ran this place. Along with all the brilliant men and women who tirelessly typed up this site, we got to see its Golden Age. Explorer and I ruled this site as one. When Explorer became inactive, then passive, and ultimately quit, I was left to fend for myself, and that, of course, was when the vicious covetous whiners pounced to tear me from power.
 * I'm not the dictator any more because ingrates can't take the fact that they don't run the place. They're not happy with actually editing and doing what's supposed to be done on the wiki. No, they want to have a say, a say they didn't earn through years of work and tens of thousands of edits. Consensus is the absence of leadership, and on a wiki, everyone is NOT equal because not everyone contributes equally.
 * -- † TurtleShroom ™!  Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! †     :)  :)     They're after my money! STOP THEM!   UNDER REPRESENTATION, PRESIDENTE! YOU ARE NOT IN THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF YOUR PEOPLE EVERY WAKING MOMENT!  [2 ]

21:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * And you know what? This place is a disaster. I almost want to stay and clean it up, but I doubt it would go anywhere.
 * This place is a disaster because all of the ingrates and whiners kept starting "petitions" and flame wars to kill me or do something so retarded that it was mostly for show.Consensus and allowing the people to rule destroys the primary focus of the site: editing it. If you notice, in the "democratic" times, whenever a new "decision" must be made, what gets all the traffic? What get all the bytes and counts? THE DECISION. All of that tiem wasted by beating each other up and habing wars could have been put into writing.
 * If you'd just give power to an oligarchy of a few extremely active men with final authority and walked away, this site WOULDN'T BE IN THIS MESS.
 * The Webmaster system was perfect until challenged. Think about how efficient and easy it was unless some brat threw a fit and the Webmaster actually had to punish someone for disturbing the peace. (-and gosh forbid that I actually have to USE that ban feature on someone more concerned with whining about how the place is run then actually helping the wiki!)
 * This goes as much to myself as all of you: if we spent all the time we're wasting on honoring Sannse with a power grab on editing the site, we'd have five new MQA3 articles from redlinks, several pictures, and another story chapter. This is a waste of time and further proof that a strongman oligarchy is the best way to run the Club Penguin Fanon Wiki.
 * -- † TurtleShroom ™!  <span title="Jesus is my doctuh and he writes me per-script-shuhs!">Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! <span title="VICTORY!!!">†     :)  :)     <span title="Get welded!">They're after my money! STOP THEM!   UNDER REPRESENTATION, PRESIDENTE! YOU ARE NOT IN THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF YOUR PEOPLE EVERY WAKING MOMENT!  <SUP>[2 ]

21:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Unless we start from scratch. Tux (*** SERVICE NOTIFICATION *** clubpenguinwiki.info IS UP) 17:58, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

[[Media:Lenin.jpg|For the motherland]] - RISE FROM YOUR GRAVE -- refractor  till my head falls off 18:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

I'm not quitting. My mind is ever alert and new ideas pop in all the time, and there's no stopping that. <span title="Wanna see my User Page 2.0?">Hello, my name is Star Kirby12. <span title="Perhaps my talk 2.0?">Chat first, ask questions later. Then let's do something! &bull;  Tobot?&bull; Some challenges?&bull; A few drafts and stuff? &bull;  23:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

I'd just like to say that I personally think the Signature policy should carry on to here as well. Unfortunately, there seem to be tons of signature problems here. SN's signature has two pictures which are huge, and break lines. We find that 20px images are big enough to be visible, but small enough to look neat. Anything bigger can make text look out of place, with everything on the same line as the signature separate from the rest of the text. Also, you can't always verify usernames. A good example is on this page itself (the page where you vote on AJ's proposal). Sanchonancho's signature links to a non-existent user, and I have to go all the way to the History just to see who the person was. -- <font face="Tahoma">Tigernose    <font face="Aharoni">Talk  •  <font face="Aharoni">Contribs  19:46, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * We can deal with signatures without resorting to banning or warning. --Happyface414''' (talk 22:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC)