User talk:Brant/Declaration of the Rights of the User

So... Let me get this straight, you took it upon yourself to name yourself the "representative of the common users". Also, "common users" can sign, but people who aren't "common users" can't sign (so admins). I hate to break it to you, but "All users have equally created accounts". You're right about that. Therefore, I'm as much of a common user as you or anyone else. The random discrimination against administrators seems unnecessary and unhelpful to the wiki as a whole, in my opinion. I'm curious to see the opinions of other users, not just yours, claiming to be the "representative" of everyone else without any sort of vote prior to- reminds me of communist leaders. Anyways, the comment I made about constructive criticism on Dave's opinion post is valid here too.   C  K   Sysop / BOBmaster ? 03:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

How dare you call me a communist? A while back a Fanon Declaration of Independence was agreed upon and signed by Penstubal, Wikipenguino, and me, with Quackerpingu signing a while later. Penstubal and I agreed on a Declaration of the Rights of the User, though at the the time it was not called so. This could either be called an edited version of the Fanon Declaration of Independence or the one Penstubal and I agree on. I planned this to be a Declaration of Independence kind of thing, where other users can edit it. Also, if you're an admin and you agree, you're free to sign. --Brant (Talk) (Contributions) 04:18, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Do not speak of me that way. I never agreed to any of your anti-administration hateful rhetoric. You just don't get jokes or anything. I very, very much doubt Wikipenguino agreed either. This was against our users has to stop. In other words, Brant is lying. -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 13:36, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

There are no "rights" that you speak of or wish for on this wiki. What has been given as "rights" is what has been deemed necessary and beneficial in the past to make our site safer and easier to use. You're not entitled to ANY rights on a website, other than those protected by the law such as privacy. So stop parading around like the world owes you something for nothing and if you want to enact positive change, start by carrying a positive attitude.

Jesus christ, people.

-- Bro  Talk to me! 10:47, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

As much as I want to defend you, since I know your heart is in the right place, this pretty much proves you've become the SJW of Fanon. --Mr Cow2 (talk) 13:17, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Excuse me, but how am I an SJW? --Brant (Talk) (Contributions) 01:19, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

I am going to make this my own way. No need of this admin hatred rubbish.-- I FEEL GR8  M8 MLG LOL. Wanna Chat? -Mcdonalds394     14:33, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

I did finish my another version  of the declaration, and I think it is better than this. Maybe all of you who are against this declaration can agree.-- I FEEL GR8  M8 MLG LOL. Wanna Chat? -Mcdonalds394     16:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Can you actually be independent for once? All I'm ever hearing from you is an echo of someone. If you don't have anything original to stay, I'll ask you nicely to stay out of this. --Brant (Talk) (Contributions) 01:19, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

My lord, it's beginning anew... I'm seeing 2009 again. This rhetoric is vaguely familiar to me. Yeah, everybody's entitled these days, right? Thank you, friends. -- Hat Pop  Bunny Ears Rule! 19:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Just as you have the right to a fair trial, you also have the right to be banned if you are found guilty. You have no impunity.
 * Adminship requests can be closed for any reason. Naturally, this makes sense. It can be opened again too, as it is needed. Right now, there doesn't seem to be any need. It's a mess having too many cooks in the kitchen.
 * This isn't the dictatorship it is claimed to be. You do have the right to say whatever you want, but this comes at a price. Who are you hurting with your words? Your actions? This needs to be considered.
 * This is a wiki where multiple people contribute. Collaboration is a requirement. If you do not want your articles or stories touched, write a book. It says this on the bottom of this editing page as I write.
 * Who's a common user? Anybody you agree with? The very idea of "everybody has a right to free speech" is violated when you remove the signatures of those who are not in line with you. You have the right to protest, as do we. Think about it.
 * Lol weren't those days bants? --Imperator Johnson (Defender of Fanon 23:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Well one, this is in my userspace, so I have every right to remove signatures. Second, that was made to prevent people from writing nonsense on here. Anybody is free to sign if they agree. --Brant (Talk) (Contributions) 01:19, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

I don't want to argue with anybody or continue this war to an extreme degree, but I'm guilty of seizing some articles, especially Copier Guy. I seized them with good faith, not to abuse the original creator. I did it so the wiki would have less LQAs and Stubs. Not trying to offend you, but could you add a rule on adoption? Thanks.  Penguinpuffdude   Hiking, or texting?   00:41, 13 May 2017 (UTC)


 * To clarify a few things, PPD, adopting doesn't count as "seizing" an article. So you're fine here. Adopting falls under a whole new policy not affected by this declaration. I'm not offended at all, and I will add an extra rule for that. --Brant (Talk) (Contributions) 01:19, 13 May 2017 (UTC)