Talk:Blockcraft

No, just NO. It's a bad article. It doesn't have an infobox, it doesn't have anything needed for an article. Besides, why do we have to parody EVERYTHING that comes into our minds. Fanon is a place for creation. --  Snow  stor  mer  It's my life! 21:08, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

We create parodies. Without parodies, this wiki wouldn't have really much interest... Penstubal    Chat!   'Land  20:09, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Shouldn't the squid puffle actually be a squid? Squids exist in Club Penguin, anyway. -- 23:50, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Aaaaand we have Enderpenguins and Testificates.

-- User:Swiss Ninja  (My Talk Page) 23:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I'd rather not have testificates here, villager penguins are a better choice. Snowstormer.png EstoniaFlag.gif  Snow stor  mer  Bless her. 08:49, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Agree with Snowstormer. -- Penstubal   Chat!   'Land  09:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

We don't have Enderpenguins, they got deleted. -- Quackerpingu   (Talk)   (Contributions)  17:47, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

I set the foundations for this article and also recently made contributions to it. I created the article. I believe that if anything, you should at least give me partial OOC rights to the article - because I created it and have made contributions recently. -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 17:42, 8 January 2019 (UTC)


 * I agree. --QP.png Quackerpingu   (Talk)   (Contributions)  17:45, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * You haven't edited this page in almost 6 years, and in case you haven't noticed most of the article from when it was yours is gone since it was a 1:1 parody and replaced with actually original content. We'll deal with this in a bit. --Chill57181 (Talk - Contributions  - My Articles )  17:50, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Chill has a point with the content, especially comparing content with Pen's last non-trivia contribution. I think he should have asked the admins before adding the template but I wouldn't say it's entirely uncalled for. -- User:EDFan 1234  5  18:00, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Chill should have added Template:WantToAdopt to the template first. --QP.png Quackerpingu   (Talk)   (Contributions)  18:04, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, but I feel like I should have partial OOC rights as a creator of the article anyway, similarly to how I shared partial OOC rights with Dps04 on Republic of Moon Island despite nearly all his contributions having been erased (the template is not there anymore solely because Bro removed it due to Dps04's inactivity). I will try to expand this page more, too, as much as possible. -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 18:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree with Quacker and Penstubal - when User:Mcdonalds394 tried to adopt CPD, everybody was reluctant to accept it until I agreed to do Shared-OOC with him. Penstubal made it, he's still active, and since Chill wrote lots, it should be Shared-OOC, whether Chill likes it or not. If it was a few minor edits like the ones everybody does on Winston and WHAT?!?, it doesn't guarantee it, but if it's a few thousand bytes or so, it should earn it. *starts shuffling away from edit war*  Penguinpuffdude  Hiking.png  It's time for a chat, no?    00:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

ARTICLES OF SEIZURE
I believe the OOC rights to Snowcraft should be given to me for the following reasons: --Chill57181 (Talk - Contributions  - My Articles )  00:33, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I've turned this article into an original parody, instead of the 1:1 parody that it was previously by thinking "what would it be like if penguins made this game", instead of the common parodying trap of "what if this game but with penguins". The updates (which previously never existed) and mobs (which used to be bad penguin or puffle fusions of the mobs in Minecraft) are full of original ideas, aside from some overlap between canonical CP and Minecraft.
 * Penstubal created this article, but aside from adding a few small pieces of trivia, has not edited it since July 2013.
 * Most of the content made back when Penstubal worked on it, as well as more content added for the next few years, was a 1:1 parody and has been removed and replaced with original content.
 * I'd go as far as to argue that without my revamp, it would've remained forgotten and possibly deleted during Delet This for being a 1:1 parody.

For (4)

 * 1) --CanadaFlag.png Bro  Talk to me! OHYEAH.png 00:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 2) --  C  K   Admin  04:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 3) --Radioactivechicken, Talk Page, °w° what's this? 14:50, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 4) -- User:EDFan 1234  5  15:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Against (1)

 * 1) --QP.png Quackerpingu   (Talk)   (Contributions)  10:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Comments

 * Did you ask stubal if you could have the ooc rights for the article? Since idk why he would say no to your sound reasoning. --  C  K   Admin  04:13, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I now see I've missed some drama about it today because quacker doesn't like the facts ducks are in it. Too bad for him, but I still think stubal should accept if asked because you have good reasoning. --  C  K   Admin  04:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * This is a discrimination of ducks since the description matches RL ducks, not CPWN ducks. --QP.png Quackerpingu   (Talk)   (Contributions)  10:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)


 * I only believe I should share OOC rights in a similar way that I shared OOC rights with Dps04 over Republic of Moon Island out of respect to him for the fact he created Moon Island and the article itself. His contributions were almost entirely gone on that page when I renovated it, but I kept it and I felt it was right. I believe the same should be done to this article. If you fear I will try to interfere with what you write, do not worry, I won't, I want to make contributions the same way others do. -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 09:53, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Then why not just let Chill have them? You're still welcome to edit the article without ooc rights, and Chill had a point that you haven't really edited the article in many years, so why have a vested interest in it now when he's shown initiative with it? --  C  K   Admin  11:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, Dps did come up with the idea of Moon Island, canonized it on the wiki, and put lots of work into it. I think that's a lot different than a bare bones 1:1 parody of Minecraft. Compare all the work Dps did on Moon Island in 2013 alone with yours the same year on Snowcraft. I'm not trying to be rude, but I don't believe your prior contributions entitle you to shared OOC. --Chill57181 (Talk - Contributions  - My Articles )  16:33, 9 January 2019 (UTC)


 * It would have been better if it was deleted. --QP.png Quackerpingu   (Talk)   (Contributions)  10:35, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I pretty much mentioned everything I have to say up above. My biggest issue with shared OOC (which I had actually thought of) is the fact that Chill completely rewrote the page. Let's say Chill made the article into a HQA or even UQA when Pen hadn't made a major contribution in years - would Pen be able to use it as his own HQA if he were to create a new country? Had Chill simply expanded the page I'd more lean in that direction, but completely rewriting it into a relatively original article compared to the borderline 1:1 parody it was before is something different entirely. Plus I want to add this is unironically a better game than actual Minecraft at this point. -- User:EDFan 1234  5  15:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm handing OOC rights to Chill57181 straight away. This I'm doing because I do not believe this is a fight I can, nor necessarily really want to, win. -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 20:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)