Club Penguin Fanon Wiki talk:Policy/Adoption

So, HQAs are adoptable now? -- Quackerpingu (talk). Who let the puffles out? 07:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)'


 * This policy isn't finished yet, so I would say no. CKSig.png  Wanna Talk?   07:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * "The quality of the article you are trying to adopt (LQA, AQA, HQA), should determine how much you have to improve the article before you can adopt it."

- You, on the policy page -- Quackerpingu (talk). Who let the puffles out? 08:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Like I said, it's not finished yet, which means that may be changed :) CKSig.png  Wanna Talk?   08:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

btw i didn't know that it didnt exist yet -- Quackerpingu (talk). Who let the puffles out? 08:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

We should really have "you're not allowed to adopt articles from active users", but I'm not sure how to write that in a way that doesn't sound awkward. ULSK12 • Talk • Contribs • Chief of Forest Guarding Services 10:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I think we should allow people to adopt articles even from active users, if the adopter hasn't edited in a long time and/or hasn't really improved it (still an LQA or something) CKSig.png  Wanna Talk?   13:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Personally, I think we should continue the policy of only allowing adoption of LQAs. Otherwise we would have people adopting more important articles, and not improving them as much, if at all. -- User:EDFan 1234  5  11:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * There is no policy, that's why I'm writing it But yeah I see you point, I was mainly thinking LQAs and AQAs, maybe HQAs you should get admin approval or something. CKSig.png  Wanna Talk?   13:38, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I agree with CK. -- Spongebob-squarepants.png Quackerpingu (talk). Who let the puffles out? QPSign.png 15:19, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

There is a pleonasm (grammatical term for superfluous extra word (there, I've made one for an example), but I've probably got the spelling wrong) - in the section "CANNOTS", it says that it "usually applies only to LQAs". If it usually applies to LQAs, then it can't really be "only", can it? Also, the UHQA no longer exists. Can an admin fix these, please? Thanks in advance,  Penguinpuffdude   It's time for a chat, no?    01:07, 10 January 2019 (UTC)