User:Penstubal/Our Country Draft

You can find out why to support it here.

The People's Country Policy Draft Here on the Club Penguin Fanon Wiki, countries are an important, and integral part of our wiki database, and must be treated as such. The Administration has no right to prevent a user from creating a country once they have fulfilled the requirements below, but they reserve the right to prevent a user who already made a country from making another one if that country is not at least a high quality article.

Any requests to make a country will be voided and ignored until you have edited this wiki for a minimum of nine months, have made at least 1,000 mainspace edits, and the user requesting a country must have fulfilled at least one of the following options:

1. User must have created at least 1 Ultra Quality Article or;

2. User must have created at least 3 High Quality Articles or;

3. User must have created at least 30 Medium Quality Articles.

A request for a user who met those requirements to create a country may only be denied if all administrators agree to do so. A user may be given a country without meeting any of the requirements should 2 out of 3 of all administrators agree to letting them create it.

Consequences
Failure to follow those rules will result in the following:


 * First Offense - Deletion and Warning


 * Second Offense - One-day block


 * Third Offense - One-week block


 * Further Offenses - Block decided by administration (cannot be more than 30 days)

My draft is open for amendments. I am ready to negotiate with users to make it even better and with administrators to make it even more rational and fair. This is just my current proposal as it stands. -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 11:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Stubal's draft is good. It should become the official policy. 15 Medium Quality Articles is the best part. -- QuackSign.png  Quackerpingu   (talk).   Contributions   A link   QuackSign2.png  13:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


 * A question:

"but they reserve the right to prevent a user who already made a country from making another one if that country is not at least a high quality article"

Which country does that country mean? The country that has already been made or the country the admins can prevent the user from making?

--   Quackerpingu   (talk).   Contributions   A link     13:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


 * That country = the country already made. For example, if you meet all the requirements and make a country, and that country is not good enough (it's not a high quality article), you cannot make another one (the administrators reserve the right to prevent you from doing that). It shouldn't be too much of a problem imo. -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 13:59, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


 * If it would be the new country, then the user would have to create it before the admins could allow/disallow the making of it :P -- QuackSign.png  Quackerpingu   (talk).   Contributions   A link   QuackSign2.png  14:10, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

To prevent abuse, the thing about 15 AQA's is gonna have to be admins deciding whether they're actually AQA's, imo ULSK12 • Talk • Contribs • Admin or no admin, I'm ULSK! 14:51, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Um, the admins WERE always the ones doing that -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 14:59, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * i've seen some users rate their own articles so just in case ULSK12 • Talk • Contribs • Admin or no admin, I'm ULSK! I WANT TO BE SPECIAL.jpg 10:23, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

We should replace the current country policy with the other one made by "Good Ol' Pen'" here.

Also, isn't medium quality AQA? -- I FEEL GR8  M8 MLG LOL. Wanna Chat? -Mcdonalds394     15:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Yep, the same thing! -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 15:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


 * I'll say. You have a really good draft for this.-- Drunk science.gif I FEEL GR8 M8 MLG LOL. Wanna Chat? -Mcdonalds394 2016.png    14:54, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

I like everything except for the 15 AQA concept. I don't think that can go well. I think it should be 5 HQA or 1 UQA. -- Dave33333   The Epic King   has returned!  17:53, 12 April 2017 (UTC)


 * I think it's pretty fair. I will raise it to 20 AQAs for now. -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 17:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)


 * I agree with Stubal. -- QuackSign.png  Quackerpingu   (talk).   Contributions   A link   QuackSign2.png  12:36, 13 April 2017 (UTC)


 * When will this (Stubal's draft) become the official policy? Like you can see above, everyone wants it. -- QuackSign.png  Quackerpingu   (talk).   Contributions   A link   QuackSign2.png  07:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Why not raise the number of AQAs to 35?  Penguinpuffdude Hiking.jpg  Hiking, or texting?   01:28, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * 25 would be better. --QuackSign.png Quackerpingu   (talk).   Contributions   A link  QuackSign2.png 08:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Why flood the wiki with 15 mediocre articles when you can just put your efforts into 5 solid, HQA articles? It improves the quality of the wiki. Adding mediocre articles is exactly why CK and Ed are putting a lot of time and effort into cleaning up the wiki. --Happyface (talk 19:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)