Talk:CREAM SODA Party

I honestly have no idea what this is a parody of. I know its something to do with Tax Day, but I'm not familiar with American culture. You lost me when I found out you use the imperial system instead of metric in math lOl.  http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/1254/lockkey.png  ZoneKill    T   C   E    20:42, April 15, 2010 (UTC)


 * Parady of the "British Tea Party", when the wigs dumped British tea into the Boston Harbor to protest taxes set by Britian during the time Britian ruled over America. I am Corai. '''Talk for yourself, Govener!  22:04, October 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * GAH! I should I have seen that, but I thought it was a parody of either the Democrats or the Republicans.  Yours Truly,   Explorer 767  http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100407022512/clubpenguinfanon/images/6/65/Xexexecolor_small.png   (  Dededoo is here to CLEAN YOUR CLOCK.  )   View this template   23:18, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

Your Welcome  I am Corai. '''Talk for yourself, Govener!  22:04, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

Actually, you're all wrong. The CREAM SODA Party is more of a Rebulican/Libertarian parody if anything. What I'm actually parodying here is the twenty-first century "Tea Party", a right-wing group of (sort of extremist) fanatics with many goals I myself love, but are called for in nutty ways. While the other stances vary, all of them call for these core items: "fiscal responsibility" (AKA reduced federal spending and paying off pub1ic debt), lowering of taxes, strict interpretation of the Constitution, and booting every last far-leftist out of Congress'. A lot of them also want to have a total audit of, and even an abolition of, the Federal Reserve, another idea I support.

(Oddly, we don't have many of these things called "moderates" on our country's Left that currently reign in our legislature. We have a minority of rightists, but few are hard-line right. Since most of our rightists are moderate, they are silent swing votes that nobody cares about. At first glance, it would actually make more sense to say "boot all Democrats", but I have discovered that we DO have moderate democrats hidden in our congressional chambers, just like we have moderate Republicans.)

The Tea Party has a ton of ideas that I agree with, but because they are fanatical and practice their beliefs through things I truly hate. When I say this, I refer to picketing, protesting, and defaming our President in public.

I despise Obama, but I'd never wave a sign calling him a "socialist" (he's actually more Statist) or depict him as evil... in public. Even then, I don't think Obama is evil. I think, actually, that he's just incompetent and far to indulgent on leftist norms, actually thinking welfare works, free healthcare at for-pay quality for every single dang hobo (we actually have healthcare for our hobos, they just don't get any benefit except go in sick and out well), and for some reason, he really thinks that Iran will stop making nukes if we "ask nicely", and he does favor "peaceful forum" with the terrorists. If anything good he did, I'd say it was ending the war in Iraq, but Lawd, he'd better not end it in Afghanistan (we're not done there!). If you want to talk evil, that'd be the leftists in our Congress, who make Obama look like a stinking moderate (and several even call him that!).

So yes, it's mainly a Republican parody. I am actually on the Tea Part's e-mail solicitation list, just so I can see what they're up to, if they're winning, and which far-left Democrats are falling flat. I love to see them fall flat, especially Barney Frank, Harry Reid, and McGovern. (laughs evilly) (Also Pelosi, but you can't get rid of someone whose entire district loves her. Safe seat.)

-- † TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! †    :)  :)  SHAWTY!      †        †       DID SOMEBODY ORDER A LARGE HAM?!       ―–    ――――      22:27, October 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, I support Obama,I think he's a good president. I think this is way, way too rightist, as many of the things on the wiki are written on a rightist point-of-view.I actually liked Obama and the Democrats on Facebook. I believe that they are doing good for you Americans. Well, I don't think you should call anyone in government evil, on both sides. I strongly oppose the Tea Party, it's way too extreme for me. What I'm think is, the Republicans are only happy when they are the majority. No offense to anyone here though.

-- Sanchonachos Universal healthcare rocks!!.  23:55, October 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * Obama... a rightist?! On whose spectrum?! I know little on Canadian politics, so I guess what he's advocating is moderate in your country. However, on American left-right scales, a call for universal healthcare is about as far left as our politics can stretch in 2010. Also, we actually have free healthcare for our hobos- don't believe those who say we don't -they just don't get any benefit except go in sick and out well. Those who pay get luxeries like rooms with windows, choosing their own doctor, and extra time in the hospital. While everyone gets healthcare, and good healthcare at that, those who work and pay for it get luxuries, while those who mooch only get cured. That's still a great deal, because the moochers get cured. Beggers can't be choosers, and in my mind, that, plus the coercive mandate of insurance, is my argument against the universal healthcare system. Everyone is entitled to be cured from illness and saved from death, but only those who work are entitled to luxuries. Hobos won't work, so they don't get luxeries, they just get cured. Why doesn't that makes sense? To get free handouts is greedy and burdensome on those who work. Everyone gets great treatment, everyone gets well, and no one is turned away. Those who work get luxeries, those who are too lazy to work get cured. Simple. Hobos aren't entitled to luxeries because they don't work for them.


 * You're not alone in thinking the Tea Party is extreme. I see all forms of protest and civil disobediance, except petitions, as a sin. If I was in the Revolution era, I'd be a Tory (and most of Georgia would have agreed with me). I agree with a LOT of their policies, but I'd never join or donate to them because they act nuts. Noble ideas, nutty delivery.


 * -- † TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! †    :)  :)  SHAWTY! <span title="Charles Kenneth Jones, 1935-2010">      †        †       DID SOMEBODY ORDER A LARGE HAM?!  </STRONG></BIG>  <span style="color: white !important;"><span title="AH HEH HEH HEH HEH! IT'S PROFESSOR LIEBSTROM!!">   ―–   <span style="color: white !important;"> ――――      20:00, October 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * P.S.: The CREAM SODA Party is spastic, too.

Canadian politics is very leftist, all parties are somewhat leftist, including our Conservative Party of Canada. Yes, I do agree on Universal Health Care. It works. But, my insurance will not go up, unlike in the United States of America. Our healthcare system is very stable, and allows everyone to have healthcare. The downside is that we only have 2.4 doctors per 1000 people (You need 12 years of studying to be a doctor..I would want to lower that a bit....). But still, our healthcare system is much, much better than a privately-run healthcare system. It's like corporate takeovers of everything.--AeroNachos 02:23, 9 November 2010 (UTC)


 * To be honest, I respect Canada's healthcare system. It works for the Canadians, and that is all that matters in my eyes. If you Canadians like how it is done, then your government is doing what it should be: serving its people in the way the people want it. Technically speaking, your government is doing what our Tea Party wants ours to do: listen to the will of the Masses and act accordingly. That and lower taxes (which isn't one of Canada's wants). One of the tenants of the Tea Party is government response to the whims of its constituants, to obey those who elected them. They, like me, believe that elected representatives are to be servants, not stweards. If the Masses don't want it, the government should not give it to them.


 * While I personally abhor your system, it doesn't matter what me, an American, thinks about it. It matters what you, a Canadian, does. If the Canadian people want universal healthcare, give it ot them! It's the Masses' will! Never accept a law "just because everyone else is doing it"; no, write law in the interests of your people alone!


 * America is a different country than Canada. What works for you might not for us. We, the consitutants, the voters of America, do not want universal healthcare. The wheel shouldn't be reinvented, no, the axle should simply be greased. You, the people of Canada, want UHC. I'd be pretty ticked if the Canadian government suddenly decided to repeal your people's UHC at their whim. That's what it feels like south of your border. Imagine if politicians were running through a measure to remove your healthcare system as it stands. How would you react? That is how we feel, getting our system overhauled. We don't like it or want it, and as the elections showed, we got our way in many areas.


 * -- † TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! †    :)  :)  <span title="We're setting off, on our own...">Sannse, don't you want to kiss the seat of my pants? <span title="Charles Kenneth Jones, 1935-2010">      †          †       <span title="Wikia's gone like a freight train, gone like yesterday, gone like a soldier in the Civil War (bang bang), gone like a 1959 Cadillac, it's gone!">    I DOMINATE!     <span style="color: white !important;"><span title="AH HEH HEH HEH HEH! IT'S PROFESSOR LIEBSTROM!!">  ――–   <span style="color: white !important;"> ―――――      21:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC)


 * P.S.: Maybe I should move this to your talk page to avoid cluttering and disturbing the mainspace.