Club Penguin Fanon Wiki talk:Staff 2017

I think I speak for everyone when I say there's faith in you picking a suitable choice for staffer. Also a side note, but I just find it hilarious that probably the most controversial wiki has ended up being the longest living wiki. -- User:EDFan 1234  5  03:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Sorry for not being very fast on the uptake (as my dad likes to say), but by "staff member" are we going to vote for a new admin that has rights on every wiki in the network? Penguinpuffdude   Summer Holidays have come!    04:09, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * New staff members are usually appointed by current staff members without a vote from the user space. They basically have admin rights on every wiki in the network and are the main authority on the network. -  Wonderweez  ( Talk · Contribs ) 04:25, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Having a second active Staff member would be helpful, but I'm not sure if any users here have both the experience needed and the ability to be unbiased in wiki matters and arguments. Perhaps before making any decisions you could train or give some sort of trials to any serious "finalists".   C  K   Sysop / BOBmaster ? 04:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

I think the best way to decide a new good Staff Member is by running a sort of competition, where every user can take place in. They could be given activities, and always a user or two would be excluded, for reasons and along the way, a member of staff could give advice and training. Over time, there would be a final 3 who would take part in a final test, and eventually the user who acts the most staff-like would be elected.

TD;LR (or something like that): Using a competition and a process of discrimination, we could find a new, good staff member. Penguinpuffdude   Summer Holidays have come!    06:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * From what I gathered, I think she already made her choice. -  Wonderweez  ( Talk · Contribs ) 06:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * >process of discrimination
 * ...is "elimination" the word you're looking for? ulsk avatar.png (T • C • Y) 08:45, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * it's TL;DR by the way, meaning Too Long; Didn't Read -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 13:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

We won't need a new staff member until you resign or quit - the only reasonable and acceptable nominee would be Wonderweez, and I believe Wonderweez would make a great staffer - do you guys agree? -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 10:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Please don't promote Ed, CK or Chill. -- Quackerpingu   (talk).   Contributions   A link   12:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

I appreciate your feedback very much, everybody. I usually like to have a vote or some reasonable facsimile, but I really did not want to have any incendiary towards a World War Three. People yelling, disagreeing, adding on a page byte upon byte of why they thought they were qualified. It's been a little tense around here lately-- I preferred not to "fan the flames", if you like. I was just going to go ahead, but I did not feel comfortable leaving my colleagues completely in the dark. Staffers were usually selected by other staffers, anyway. It's not like I have any staff to consult with. It's just a lot less red tape if I make the decision. -- Hat Pop  Bunny Ears Rule! 14:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Wonderweez is the absolute best choice one could make as he is the least divisive, most competent and most experienced of all users on the entire network. He has a capability to do great things, he is extremely popular and he knows words. Congratulations to Wonderweez, I sincerely wish you well my friend! -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 17:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * He has the best words. Tremendous. YUUUUGE. --CanadaFlag.png Bro  Talk to me! OHYEAH.png 22:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)