Club Penguin Fanon Wiki talk:Guide to Rating Articles

Well, here's an article that is an integral part of wiki continuity. It's a LQA, although this page says that it should be an UQA. -- QUACKERPINGU WITH BIG LETTERS!   (talk).   Contributions   A link   10:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)


 * You misunderstand, being tied to continuity is an important factor for articles to become HQAs and UQAs. Just because it meets one specification doesn't mean it should be that category.   C  K    Happy Holidays!  11:02, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * A UQA has to be a little bit more than being integral to continuity. As mentioned in the criterion, we need a large amount of quality content in order for it to be considered such an article. With said content, we would also need stellar language mechanics (grammar, spelling, vocabulary) to match up with the quality of the information. While the page does have good language mechanics, it simply does not have enough information to work with. Some good examples for UQA articles could be found in Category:Ultra Quality Articles. Perhaps you'd be interested in expanding and working it towards UQA standards? --  merry crisis  ARB logo.png  it's beginning to look a lot like,,, crisis  11:05, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Maybe in the future. I have to expand some other LQAs first. --QP.png QUACKERPINGU WITH BIG LETTERS!   (talk).   Contributions   A link  Quackerpingu2.png 11:20, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Just curious, but do former admins get to rate articles too?  Penguinpuffdude   It's time for a chat, no?    13:12, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * My guess is that it's a bit debatable given that Bro was on the list before he reapplied. ulsk avatar.png Current Status: college apps are over, yeet (T • C • Y) 13:33, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Usually yes. Any experienced users are allowed to rate. I'm sure good retired users (Swiss, TS, Chub777, etc.) would be allowed to rate if they returned, too, without having to prove themselves. --CanadaFlag.png Bro  Talk to me! OHYEAH.png 04:04, 7 February 2019 (UTC)


 * That can lead to bad consequences if the rating standards were lower when they were here. For example, there was a short walrus LQA or stub that was rated as HQA. --QP.png  Quackerpingu   (Talk)   (Contributions)  07:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * It's not hard to talk to someone and tell them about the changes. If they refuse to listen, rating privileges could be revoked. --Chill57181 (Talk - Contributions  - My Articles )  15:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If it is a former admin, he/she can just get his/her admin rights back and continue rating articles. --QP.png Quackerpingu   (Talk)   (Contributions)  16:07, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Side note, can I rate articles? :DDD ulsk avatar.png Current Status: college apps are over, yeet (T • C • Y) 08:03, 8 February 2019 (UTC)