Help talk:Congress/Vote equality

I hated it when people ay only the BOB an vote in Congress. This isn't the democracy, it's an oligarchy.

My solution? Let anyone vote in Congress. This makes it a democacy and kritocracy. Otherwise, it's webmasterism all over again. except the amounts of WMs are greatly increased. -- Zapwire  ( Living after midnight, rockin' to the dawn ) 16:51, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Leader's View
I half agree. First of all, we're not Kritocracy. Kritocracy is a nation ruled by judges. BOB ain't judges. We are a mix between a Representative democracy and a Parliamentary democracy.

Anyway, back to the subject. My view is:

1. First, the BOB votes on whether we should allow users, sysops and rollbacks vote.

2. A template will be put up, saying whether anybody can vote, or only BOBmasters should.

2.1. If only BOB can vote, then a comment section will be added, so that the users can express there views.

3. This makes us a: Representative democracy Parliamentary democracy Republic with a Upper House Congress and a Lower House Senate. For short, a BOBmasterism Republic!


 * I agree with the Leader. There should be a decision made on who can vote before the bill opens. And the comment box is also a good idea.  Yours "Falsely",   Explorer 767 ( The Nerd Quibbles On...  )    View this template   20:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I say, we leave Congress be. But users can express their vote on the talk, but that cvote doesn't count. --HappyfaceWantsToTalk 20:48, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Though I agree with HF and say not to change it, I would gladly adhere to the Leader's policy, because it's a darn good one! -- † कछुए मशरूम! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! †    :)  :) DON'T YOU DARE QUIT BECAUSE OF WHAT I JUST TYPED!!!!!!!! † 21:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


 * -- Karazachi (Talk)  Animal Farm 22:57, 1 August 2009 (UTC)


 * -- I agree with Zapwire. Leader's plan is good too. -Mectrixctic

VERDICT
Passed, but altered to Leader and HF's versions.

Passed on conditions outline din commentary.