User talk:Quackerpingu/Archive 2

Quiz
You got 13 questions wrong.

-- User:Swiss Ninja  (My Talk Page) 04:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Stop
Your idiocy has gone on for too long, and it is obvious that your last block was insufficient. Any more immature acts on your part will result in a block. -- Bro  Talk to me! 21:15, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

DUDE
For being an admin. I fear, that you will block me forever for no reason.--Mcdonalds394 The famous one of Mcdonalds City would like to chat with you! 16:44, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Warning
Hey Quacker. Nobody's trying to "attack" you or your articles. We're editing them to make the better, which is the purpose of a wiki. Just a notice- Club Penguin Fanon Wiki:Three-revert rule. Please don't revert Bro's edit again or else you will be banned for 12 hours to a day.  Wanna Talk?   17:07, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

deletion
You have 3 months to get those articles to MQA.

Mectrixctic  Talk to me! See the articles I worked on. . see my edits! 19:05, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

For what purpose
Humans exist in continuity, you can't change that. Stop reverting any changes that you don't agree with. Plus, calling for other users to be blocked makes you look like a jerk. Don't do any of that. -- User:EDFan 1234  5  12:20, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

I dare you to click these words and read the article ULSK12 &bull; Talk &bull;  Contribs  &bull; Youtube Bison King, Rescue Riser, Gosei Great, Go Buster-Oh, Machalcon- oops, dropped my wishlist.  05:48, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

. ..

 * Me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me and me.

Can you please accept the human article and leave it the way as it is? -- 06:13, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

I guess that is okay to remove, due to the graph. -- 08:05, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Re:
I'm not sure what to say. It seems like this person might be HF, but I'm not sure. If so, don't be alarmed. Just make sure this person doesn't copy-paste material from our fanon to the old one.

I also from this point forward encourage you to make your own Club Penguin Fanon Wiki on Wikia. The more club penguin fanon wikis on Wikia, the better, since it will divert/slow down the flow of incoming new users to the old Fanon wikia.

-- User:Swiss Ninja  (My Talk Page) 19:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop starting fights with the users on wikia. It does nothing more than demonize the CPWN even more to them. Plus, wikia staff really don't like us, and you're just making it worse. -- User:EDFan 1234  5  16:01, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi friend
Hey there, I see you're a respectable user not going behind everyone's back -- User:EDFan 1234  5  21:58, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Buddy!
I SEE YOU'RE A NICE FRIEND WHO DOESN'T BETRAY ANYBODY

--Mr Cow2 (talk) 23:20, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Lavender
In my opinion, you haven't done anything wrong other than continuing a revert war. But, just for your own good, please don't contribute to the revert war any more. And, I'd suggest getting permission from bro before changing his articles because he can be fussy if you don't, just a word of advice.  Wanna Talk?   03:00, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I don't like anybody touching my articles unless I give you prior permission. -- Bro  Talk to me! 09:17, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Human
The revision right now is how the human page is going to stay. You've not only been vandalizing the article, but also breaking the three-revert rule again. I would ban you again but it doesn't seem to do any good. So, I'd suggest that for your own good, you don't edit the Human page any more, even after it's unprotected, because you're the one at fault. Anyone is allowed to edit articles and make them larger, and that's what someone did to the Human article, it's completely fine. Humans will never be a major species in Antarctica, so it's fine.  Wanna Talk?   14:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

AHAHAHAHAHAHA, no, it doesn't. Humans have been to Antarctica in real life and there's nothing preventing them from doing so. Also, it makes sense because the CPFW wants to have better relations with their fellow universes in the Multiverse, so lifting the ban is the best thing that politicians can do. Not to mention the fact that good ol' Transcendental Ninja here might be a human child raised by the BoF... in Antarctica. ULSK12 &bull; Talk &bull;  Contribs  &bull; Youtube 'WASSHOI YEEHAW! APPARE NINJA! WASSHOI YEEHAW! APPARE NINJA! KING SHURIKENJIN!' 00:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Bears
Sure, I'll check it out later and let you know what I find out! :)  Wanna Talk?    19:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Bear articles
All of the articles were either here already or have been imported. Norbert and Amber were created in 2011, which is why they weren't imported. However, they seem like decent characters so I'll allow them as long as any OOC can be removed/changed so they fit with our continuity. The page Bishop Henry P. Bear was deleted some time ago for being an LQA. Please don't re-create it (or it will be deleted again)- if you would like it revived, please give me a good reason to revive it on my talk page.  Wanna Talk?   21:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

RE:
*gets up*

wat the heck r u doing ULSK12 • Talk • Contribs • I carry a GBA to school 09:18, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

RE:
Yes there is, see the top-right part of the city map -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 17:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)


 * wow nvm I forgot he renamed it -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 17:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Meh, I will just keep this one for now. -- Penstubal (Talk) (Edits) 17:07, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Stop

 * 1) Your article does meet lqa standards, other than having an image. You also don't haven't authority to change that.
 * 2) Since you changed it to the construction template, I expect you to keep expanding it to be a higher-quality article.

Also, please stop whining every time someone does something that you don't like. This wiki isn't just about you. -- User:EDFan 1234  5  16:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Not trying to hurt your feelings, but I agree with Ed. Your article is an LQA. Also, it's our jobs as admins/experienced users to give articles a quality rating that we feel is appropriate. If you don't agree with a rating given, don't remove the rating template, but add the "QualityReview" template at the top of the page, and an admin will look over the page and adjust the rating if the first rating was wrong. If you have any questions, feel free to ask.

Personally, I think you might want to focus on expanding one article at a time, rather than having 5+ characters who you try to expand simultaneously, but it's up to you.  Wanna Talk?   22:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

RE:
He'll do it if he wants to. ULSK12 • Talk • Contribs • 'GE! KI! AT! SU! HA-OOOOH!' 15:08, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Greetings


-- Slender  Talk to me   10:47, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Calm down!
Birthday shoutouts are very rarely on time. Sometimes up to a day of delay.

Besides, at least from my point of view, it's 2 in the morning. Don't ask how I'm awake, specially since today is a school day.

I guess it's 6 am in the Wiki's standard time, but still. People have lives and get busy. Be patient.

--Some fool (And this is a talk page.) 07:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Happy Birth'day.
Happy day of your birth.

Oh and by the way, you came from a HUMAN woman, not an egg.

--Mr Cow2 (talk) 23:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

RE:
I'd answer to your statement, but I'm too busy laughing at the fact that you used the Ban font in hopes of intimidating me. Let me come back after I've settled down a bit... <font face="comic sans ms">ULSK12 • Talk • Contribs • 'GE! KI! AT! SU! HA-OOOOH!' 14:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

RE:.
Sorry, but the old wiki version is better. It's actually related to Club Penguin, and isn't just taken from Spongebob. You can reupload the image of Gary (the snail) on a new image if you'd like, and p[lace it in a Gallery section on the page (Maybe saying he's a regional version, similar to how there's more than one "version" of Santa Claus. CKSig.png Merry  Christmas   18:09, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Look
The wiki doesn't revolve around you. You can't do whatever you want and then complain to CK when someone tells you it's against the rules. You can't adopt HQAs, it's against the rules. You can edit them, but don't completely change them like you are. I'm sorry, but the wiki has rules that you need to follow. -- User:EDFan 1234  5  18:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

^ Sorry, but HQA's are not adoptable for this exact reason, so users can't completely change those articles. Merry  Christmas  20:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Oh, man, I am laughing at Quack while watching this whole ordeal, especially Quacker's rant on CK's page. --Mr Cow2 (talk) 21:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

-_-

 * 1) No. I can't stop others from editing it, either, it's their own will. And besides, you are editing it too, starting with reverting my own edit.
 * 2) There's no need to ban for that reason. Technically, you have a reason to be banned. The three-revert rule. And also I can't ban anyway.
 * 3) It goes with the melody and uses Flippling-ish humor, so I won't remove it. Fits in context.

Merry Christmas or other generic winter holiday you celebrate!

--Merry ChriSMASH! (And this is a talk page.) 16:26, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello
Funny how a lot of people forget about me being admin. But I guess I'm just a quiet observer. The way I see it, Darth Herbert was meant to be a promotion for Disney buying Star Wars/inciting product placement for it. In addition, there's no circumstantial evidence that it was maintained as a "job."

Due to this, to place "Darth Herbert" on a separate page would be, in my opinion, preposterous, just due to the short amount of time it was maintained as a "job." I would, rather, make it perhaps a separate heading or subpage for Herbert, due to the size of it and the fact that it's canon and therefore must be kept to canon standards.

Does this mean "Herbert" is now yours? No. It means, however, you're more than welcome to improve on "Herbert," however, and make it your own. Inciting the banning of multiple users, also, isn't productive and should be condoned by multiple users, which is exactly what they're doing. I'm sure you can work it out between them and determine the appropriate course of action to be taken regarding your adoption rights and the current article. -  Wonderweez  ( Talk · Contribs ) 02:04, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Dear Quackerpingu
There is a concerning amount of articles which redirect to your sandbox page. I would like to ask what is your reasoning for linking such pages, which you mention in other articles, to a private User Sandbox.

Sincerely,

--User:Fooly8

But
When will you actually make those pages? And to be more precise, will you actually make those pages? You can't keep referring to a number of walruses, a few polar bears and the Quackerpingu character if we have no idea what they are like.

--User:Fooly8

Cool!
I like it. It would've been funnier if Fuzzle was some other character, like Palpatine or Maul, but I still like it.

(EDIT: Scratch that. Fuzzle actually looks great.)

Good job!

--Show me you moves! (And this is a talk page.) 17:40, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Listen here
I've had enough of you and your constant whining. I've had enough of your constant immaturity. I've had enough of your arrogance and I've had enough of your shotty workmanship around here.

You have done just about nothing to improve this wiki. All you do is spam, whine and try to attack people when they so much as mention a human. Calling the WAAAAAmbulance and going to other admins to ban me (or others, for that matter) for reverting your OOC edits or for protecting the editing rights of other users will achieve nothing and serves only to drive everybody up the wall. You have wasted countless amounts of time and energy to deal with your immaturity.

Why do you refuse to grow up? What makes you so arrogant to believe that you should always get your way on a website where you have done nothing to deserve our respect? It's not in your best interest to spend your time here being immature and making enemies. It's not in your best interest to torment other users because you don't like something they said. If you're going to act like a little brat, make a Tumblr account. Stop freaking out at users for insignificant things. Be cordial. Explain your reasoning for your actions/opinions instead of throwing a hissyfit when someone disagrees.

I hope this will be your wake-up call; your attitude and actions will not be tolerated on this wiki much longer (and it has taken all my willpower not to infinitely ban you already). Your attitude is reckless and divisive and I, not even to mention the rest of the administration, will not tolerate it. You still have a chance to improve before we decide if we scrap you or not. I'm not trying to bully or discourage you, but you need to realize that more experienced users know better than you and that we know what is best for this wiki.

Thank you.

-- <font color="#0fd000"><font color="006C91">Bro  Talk to me! 19:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Antibodies
Hey Quackers! I'm sorry to say, but you can only have one X-Antibody... You can choose whichever one you'd like and expand it. Though that's not entirely a bad thing! I know you want to help the wiki out and make more articles/characters- but remember that quality is more important than quantity, so one well-written Antibody character is better than five short stubby articles or sections on a page (The same thing applies to Walrus pages). <font face="comic sans ms"> Wanna Talk?   15:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

RE: No
Like I said, you can have one, and that's it. I don't mean any offense, but I don't think you're a skilled enough editor yet to make five antibodies and make them all "good" characters (still evil, but good, fleshed out characters). I agree with you about some of the "boring rules" (in continuity that is), but until you're a skilled user it's just a waste of time and space to make 4 extra short stubby articles.

Feel free to make sections or subpages for the other four antibodies in your personal userspace (User:Quackerpingu/name). This is the end of the discussion, and I know Bro and some of the admins will support my judgement. <font face="comic sans ms"> Wanna Talk?   17:46, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

2015 CPFW Awards!
Hi there Quacker! The nominations period for the 2015 CPFW Awards was going to end yesterday, but I decided to extend it one more day so everyone can be sure to have their chance. So please, take a few minutes today to nominate up to two things for each award, on this page, and come back starting tomorrow to start voting! Thanks for your contributions to the wiki in 2015, and for your participation :) <font face="comic sans ms"> Wanna Talk?    06:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Boo hoo, protocol didn't exist yet. You'd call me a liar if I said I'm a human too. <font face="comic sans ms"> Wanna Talk?   14:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

idk
Good for you, I guess.

--2016! (And this is a talk page.) 18:51, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Walrus8
*sigh*

Ok, so, about your Walrus8 request from a week or so ago.

You cannot make something, replace something else, then ask for the original to be deleted. I moved the FAKE Walrus8 (yours) to, so it wasn't deleted.

My personal suggestion for you is to merge your articles, if you so desire, or I can do it for you. What I mean by merging is, add information to Walrus8 from your page that won't override what the page already has. For example, Walrus8 is a neutral, formerly bad penguin who was a part of the Walrus Army, who constantly raided the CPW, but retired after he lost a flipper in his last battle. He is friends with Happyface, which cements his neutrality. If you wanted to "merge" your content into the original page, to expand it, you couldn't really involve Walrus8 in the Crime Ring (because that'd be OOC), but you could still say he got coal from Snail Claus or Santa Claus. If you have any questions, feel free to ask them on my talk page. <font face="comic sans ms"> Wanna Talk?   02:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Warlus8
I'm gonna go ahead and answer for CK here...


 * 1) Happyface is an HQA and a pretty big article. Just because it isn't mentioned on the article doesn't mean it never happened.
 * 2) You do realize that the same injury can happen to two people, right? And by your logic, Shadow Walrus should be OOC since he's the second one to lose a fin.
 * 3) If continuity is broken, this wiki would be quite a mess.

If you'd like to keep your article, name it something else. Don't simply attempt to remove the article from existence- you realize, the article was made by TurtleShroom, right? You're lucky you never encountered him, he'd probably give you a super-long lecture about how immature you are.

The article has been protected. Go do something productive for a change. <font face="comic sans ms">ULSK12 • Talk • Contribs • Chief of Forest Guarding Services 11:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! IT'S-IT'S THE BAN FONT AGAIN! HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAA!! HAA... haa.... i need a moment.... <font face="comic sans ms">ULSK12 • Talk • Contribs • Chief of Forest Guarding Services Ace dances.gif 11:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

RE: Warning
Ok, you clearly don't understand how OOC works. The Walrus8 article (not yours) was the first. No matter what that page says, it is in the continuity. That page says he lost a fin, and that he's friends with happyface, so that's official.

You trying to replace what's on that page with your own content is what's OOC. It's Out Of Character of the article that was already there. That is also against the rules, so don't do it again. Consider this your warning. <font face="comic sans ms"> Wanna Talk?   14:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Uhh...
Thanks, I guess? -- This is a Puffle. This is a talk page. Here's a notepad. ALL THE PUFFLES, ONE PLACE: PUFFLE LAND. 21:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop
Please don't make categories that have no purpose (User categories for things that aren't actual users), and also please stop with all of the redirects to your userspace, whether it be other user pages or just article names. It's useless and very annoying. <font face="comic sans ms"> Wanna Talk?   19:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)